Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js
Gonzaga Law Review
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • General
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • search

    Sorry, something went wrong. Please try your search again.
    ×

    • Articles
    • Blog posts

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

https://gonzagalawreview.com/feed
×
General
Vol. 21, Issue 3, 1986 July 16, 2020 PDT

Evidence of a Defendant’s Refusal to Submit to a Breathalyzer Test is Admissible Only For the Purpose of Controverting a Contention Raised by the Defendant. State v. Zwicker, 105 Wn.2d 228, 713 P.2d 1101 (1986)

Steve Brooks ,
  • evidence
  • traffic stop
  • breathalyzer
  • criminal procedure
Photo by Arisa Chattasa on Unsplash
Gonzaga Law Review
Steve Brooks, Evidence of a Defendant’s Refusal to Submit to a Breathalyzer Test Is Admissible Only For the Purpose of Controverting a Contention Raised by the Defendant. State v. Zwicker, 105 Wn.2d 228, 713 P.2d 1101 (1986), 21 Gonzaga Law Review 819 (2020).
Save article as...▾
  • PDF
  • XML
  • Citation (BibTeX)
Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system